The Future of Radiological Protection
Welcome to the Archive of the Future of Radiological Protection Digital Workshop
ICRP is comprised of over 250 of the world’s leading radiation experts. We are the “keepers” of the System of Radiological Protection, but the System exists for those who use it to protect patients, workers, the public, and the environment. Collaboration with the people it impacts the most is essential.
Over the next decade, we will work together to develop the next general recommendations that will shape radiation-related policy, practice, guidelines, and regulations around the world.
The Keeping the ICRP Recommendations Fit For Purpose paper is a key step in that process. Through many conversations over the last couple of years and ICRP experience, this paper summarises the topics being considered for the future of RP.
This workshop created an opportunity to engage in the review and revision of the System of Radiological Protection, in particular based on two open-access papers recently published by ICRP:
Keeping the ICRP Recommendations Fit for Purpose (Clement, et al.)Journal of Radiological Protection |
Areas of Research to Support the System of Radiological Protection (Laurier, et al.)Radiation and Environmental Biophysics |
The digital workshop took place 14 October to 3 November 2021. It included two Live Sessions per day, on 19-20 October 2021. In addition, 43 On-demand Presentations were available from 14 October 2021 until 3 November 2021, inclusive. It is summarised in the open-access paper below, and below you will find the recordings of all sessions, and on-demand presentations.
Summary of the 2021 ICRP Workshop on the Future of Radiological ProtectionJournal of Radiological Protection |
LIVE SESSIONS
ON-DEMAND PRESENTATIONS
TG 36: The Revision of Dose Coefficients in Diagnostic Nuclear MedicineAugusto Giussani, et al. |
TG 91: Radiation Risk Inference at Low-Dose and Low-Dose Rate Exposure for Radiological Protection PurposesWerner Rühm, et al. |
TG 110: Protecting Animals Within a Revised Radiological Protection FrameworkR. J.Pentreath |
TG 111: Factors Governing the Individual Response of Humans to Ionising RadiationSimon Bouffler, et al. |
TG 114: Reasonableness and Tolerability in the System of Radiological Protection: ICRP TG114 On-Going ReflectionsThierry Schneider, et al. |
TG 114: The Three R's of Reasonable: Relationships, Rationale, and ResourcesNicole Martinez, et al. |
TG 115: Risk and Dose Assessment for Radiological Protection of AstronautsWerner Rühm, et al. |
TG 118: Building Upon ICRP92 on RBE, Radiation Weighting Factor and Q FactorGayle Woloschak, et al. |
TG 119: Effects of Ionising Radiation on Diseases of the Circulatory System and Their Consideration in the System of Radiological ProtectionTamara Azizova, et al. |
A Promising Concept for the Development of Means for the Prevention of Radiation PathologiesMarina Filimonova, et al. |
A Study for Dose Impact of MCR Operators in Nuclear Power Plants Under ICRP 30 and ICRP 60Seung-Chan Lee |
Advancing the Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) in Radiation Research: An International Horizon-Style ExerciseJulie J. Burtt, et al. |
Assessment of Non-Human Biota Dose at the El Amin University Proposed Site, Minna, NigeriaM. Gomina, et al. |
Attitudes of Staff Involved in Dental Radiological Procedures in Georgia Towards Radiation Protection and Safety: A Questionnaire-Based StudyDavid Nadareishvili, et al. |
Calibration of a Dosimetric System in Hp (3) Using a Cylindrical PhantomAndrea Castillo, et al. |
Challenges in Radiation Protection for the Environment and Non-Human BiotaEdith Villegas Garcia |
Comments on the System of Radiological ProtectionMichael Moores, Sören Mattsson |
Data Visualization and Gendered Questions in Radiation ProtectionMary Olson |
Developing the System of Radiological Protection to Enhance Its Contribution to the UN Sustainable Development GoalsA. Mayall, et al. |
Does the System of Radiological Protection Require Science to the Nth Degree to be Fit For Purpose?Cameron Jeffries |
HERCA Suggestions for ICRP Future Work AreasKarla Petrová |
ICRP Recommendations May Be Fit-For-Purpose, But Without Adequate Human Resources, We Just Wont Get ThereCarmel J. Caruana, Eric Pace |
ICRP: It is Time for a Change, Now!Bernd Lorenz |
Impact of New Developments in the Commissioning of Operational Radiation Protección in Compact Proton Therapy Centers (CPTC)Gonzalo García-Fernández, et al. |
Influence of Different Operating Modes (High, Normal and Low) and FOV Sizes on Air Kerma Rate in Different Interventional Radiology EquipmentA.R.P. Cruz, T.S. Jornada |
InterDosi-Based Monte-Carlo Assessment of S-Values on a Voxel-Based Crab Phantom for Cs-137, Te-132 and Co-58Hafssa BenDriss, et al. |
Issues Concerning the Carcinogenesis Risk and Implementation of the System of RPMichiya Sasaki, et al. |
LNT Model is not an “Assumption”: Re-Analysis of Epidemiological Data Empirically Supports LNTYutaka Hamaoka |
Making ICRP Recommendations ‘Fit For Purpose’ for the Response to a Nuclear or Radiological EmergencyJessica Callen-Kovtunova, Thomas McKenna |
Managing Ionising Radiation Risks: The Need for a Broader ContextMarcel Lips, Alexandre de Ruvo |
Modernising Optimisation in Decision MakingGreg Lamarre, et al. |
Optimzation of Dose for Adult Chest Computed Tomography Examinations: A Phantom StudyLynn Ninsiima, et al. |
Personal Online Dosimetry Using Computational Methods: The PODIUM Project and the Future of Active DosimetryFilip Vanhavere |
Quantitative Assessment of Risk Perception for Low Dose RiskShigeru Kumazawa, et al. |
Radiation Detriment Calculation Methodology: Review of Current Non-Radiation-Related Parameters and PerspectivesLudovic Vaillant, et al. |
Radiation Protection Culture, Communication and ContextHugh Wilkins |
Radiation Protection Perspective to Recurrent Medical Radiological ImagingJenia Vassileva, Ola Holmberg |
Radiation-Induced Stem Cell Competition and Dose-Rate EffectMasanori Tomita, et al. |
Radiological Risk in the Global Burden of DiseaseBernd Grambow |
Scientific Improvement on Social Understanding of Tritium, Ten Years After the Fukushima Nuclear AccidentYoshiyuki Mizuno |
Self-Assessed Radiation Safety Culture Across SectorsCatherine Taylor |
Strategies to Implement Dose Reference Level in Tomography in Brazil: Preliminary AnalysisMônica Oliveira Bernardo, et al. |
SPONSORS
Thank you to those individuals and organisations who provided Global Support for this workshop! Your generosity and leadership have made this workshop accessible and inclusive for all.
|
Wesley Bolch |
Michael Boyd |
Chanhyeong Kim |
Andrea Magistrelli |
Werner Rühm |
|
Dave Tucker |
Robert Walker |
Marie-Claire Cantone |
Christopher Clement |
Daniele Giuffrida |